I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
Ранее в США спустя 40 лет полиция разыскала пропавшую в трехлетнем возрасте Мишель Ньютон и предъявила обвинения ее матери. Женщина уехала с ребенком, солгав отцу, что они будут ждать его на новом месте.，更多细节参见体育直播
Италия — Серия А|27-й тур，推荐阅读体育直播获取更多信息
（三）违反监察机关在监察工作中、司法机关在刑事诉讼中依法采取的禁止接触证人、鉴定人、被害人及其近亲属保护措施的。